[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: was: Re: concerning debian-reference and the necessity for the competitors



Hi, I am back :-)

On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:11:15PM +0100, Davor Ocelic wrote:
> # Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:41:15 -0800
> # Sender: Osamu Aoki <osamu@aokiconsulting.com>
> 
> > Davor Ocelic, your hands-on guide covers both 1 and 2 area.  your
> > document style seems very in sync with John's and Progeny's and you are
> > doocbook writer.  Do you want to take a lead on this area?
> 
> Uhm, sorry for not replying any sooner, I did not realize I was mentioned
> on the list till just now (I have no idea how I missed it).
> 
> I will check out "John's" and "Progeny's" to see what exactly are we talking
> about.

"John's":
 package: debian-guide
 http://ceu.fi.udc.es/docs/debian-user-guide_1.0/

"Progeny's":
 http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/users-guide/users-guide.en.html

> Also, what would "taking the lead" actually mean? Coordinating the 
> effort, or working towards integration of the documents into one?

"taking the lead" possibly means for you to coordinate with people with
similar interests under your leadership :-)  "...into one" is one
possible path but you can propose otherwise.

I think John Pisini <lynjohn@attbi.com> had offered help and created
http://cafecomputer.com/proposal.htm  (based on Progeney's)

See the posting by him for more.
 From: John Pisini <lynjohn@attbi.com>
 Subject: Re: concerning debian-reference and the necessity for the competitors
 To: debian-doc@lists.debian.org
 Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 14:00:10 -0500

Discussing with Install manual folks not to duplicate too much efforts.
That can be done here.

-- 
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
        Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>   Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
 .''`.  Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
 : :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
 `. `'  "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract



Reply to: