[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DebianDoc-SGML outstanding issues

Osamu Aoki (osamu@debian.org) wrote:
> Hi
> Are you closing them completely or giving "wontfix".
> I think it deserves "wontfix" :-) so you will not get bugged.

I prefer to close them completely.  They are definitely not high runners
for any future version.  And they will always be available as archived.

> On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:45:58PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > While going through the list of outstanding issues for debiandoc-sgml
> > I started to wonder whether these all are still applicable.  Below is
> > the list of outstanding issues and my proposal for each of them.
> >  8. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=141727
> >     <table> tag and how it can be implemented
> > 
> >     Proposal = implement
> It will be nice :-) Please make sure conversion to docbook-xml is easy.
> #1 priority in terms of usefulness.  But a bit complicated.

Well, I will first do the indices and enum stuff (those are easier :-).

> If you do this, I can stay in debiandoc-sgml longer.


> > Then there are also some outstanding issues for debiandoc-sgml-doc:
> > 2. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=43718
> > 
> >    Proposal = implement
> Please.  I think we need some guidance in how to build CJK things for
> PS/PDF, if you can.  I am asamed to admit that I do not know it.

Well, that makes then two of us.  But I'll look into this.

Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: ardo@debian.org
home page:  http://people.debian.org/~ardo
GnuPG fp:   3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73  7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9

Reply to: