On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 10:52:58AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:21:19PM +0200, David Schmitt wrote: > > On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 10:16:32PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > > - documentation packages should *not* include the documentation, they > > > should just do a "cvs co" from the DDP CVS (see harden-doc for example, > > > or the java-common package) > > > > Please reconsider that with respect to offline reading and - especially > > in Europe where quite a few of the targeted audience live - constrained > > bandwidth (and download volume). > > I was talking about the sources. I might have not expressed myself > correctly. That is, sources should not have the documents, they should > just do a 'cvs co' or, if they had the sources they should be using > cvs-buildpackage and update from the DDP CVS. Oh, then I did misinterpret, what you said. > Of course, documentation packages (binaries) should include the > documentation for offline reading. Thank you, David Schmitt -- Signaturen sind wie Frauen. Man findet selten eine Vernuenftige -- gesehen in at.linux Signaturen sind wie Frauen. Hat man einmal eine Vernuenftige gefunden gibt man sie nicht wieder her. -- Hubert Partl
Attachment:
pgphSSgQkHH4s.pgp
Description: PGP signature