On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:10:18AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > 3.7.3 TEX > > > > Is this section even necesary? Are there really manuals that can't > > use default pool sizes? If there are, wouldn't that be a TeX bug? > > Some of documents including mine usually run over limit of current TEX > in stable and testing. I heard new version in unstable will fix it but > testing script is frozen now. (I bet Javi's document is getting too > big. Something like 100 page is limit usually.) I just tried to compile it. Ouch. See this: $ make securing-debian-howto.en.pdf debiandoc2latexpdf -l en -c securing-debian-howto.sgml debiandoc2latexpdf: ERROR: securing-debian-howto.pdf could not be generated properly debiandoc2latexpdf: rerun with the -v option to found out why debiandoc2latexpdf: or check the log file securing-debian-howto.log make: *** [securing-debian-howto.en.pdf] Error 1 $ tail securing-debian-howto.log (...) Error: pdflatex: buffer overflow $ wc securing-debian-howto.sgml 10176 57363 409543 securing-debian-howto.sgml However: $ make securing-debian-howto.es.pdf debiandoc2latexpdf -l es securing-debian-howto.es.sgml $ wc securing-debian-howto.es.sgml 697 7718 51009 securing-debian-howto.es.sgml Which is a previous version (the translation is not uptodate yet) So it seems we have a problem with PDF generation through LaTeX with long documents (who is the responsible? debiandoc-sgml? LaTeX?) > > > Also, that's not how TeX is spelled. > > My appologies. I've fixed it (as well as LaTeX) > > > Suggest the be a note that doc-base entries are recommended, if not > > required... > > OK. Please write and commit your idea to CVS. > I'll add a TODO item for the moment (until I get around to write it). Regards Javi
Attachment:
pgpunqcQtK1R2.pgp
Description: PGP signature