Re: debiandoc vs. docbook
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:04:52PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Susan Kleinmann wrote:
> > Any XSLT processor + docbook XSLT stylesheets => HTML and
> > HTML + htmldoc => indexed HTML, postscript, or pdf
> > Haven't tried this yet.
>
> I suspect this will produce the best output at the moment.
>
> If anyone wants to play with it, the dpkg CVS tree has DocBook
> documentation (partial reference manual and a bunch of manpages).
> Currently in SGML, but if I remember correctly the only thing you
> need to change to turn them into XML is the header.
$ CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.debian.org:/cvs/dpkg
$ cvs co dpkg
internals.sgml was in old debiandoc style but en/reference.sgml is new
XML ready form.
This could be a good example of mark-up levels but not all
functinalities in debiandoc-sgml are used.
How should I translate SGML tags:
<list>
<list compact>
and similars?
TIA
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
: :' : http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ also http://qref.sf.net
`. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract
Reply to: