[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debiandoc vs. docbook

At (time_t)1032615395 Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Previously John R. Daily wrote:
> > * FOP is also packaged, but I wouldn't advocate using its output.
> What is wrong with it?

Just generally poor quality.  As an example, with a recent
version my table of contents only had roughly half the page
numbers it should have, so it would look something like:

1      Foo .............. 
1.1    Bar ..............
1.1.1  Baz ..............  2

(The above is from vague memory.)

It seems like a product with much work ahead of it before it
becomes generally useful.  Perhaps a stylesheet with a targetted
subset of FO would help matters.


Reply to: