Re: debiandoc vs. docbook
At (time_t)1032615395 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously John R. Daily wrote:
> > * FOP is also packaged, but I wouldn't advocate using its output.
>
> What is wrong with it?
Just generally poor quality. As an example, with a recent
version my table of contents only had roughly half the page
numbers it should have, so it would look something like:
1 Foo ..............
1.1 Bar ..............
1.1.1 Baz .............. 2
(The above is from vague memory.)
It seems like a product with much work ahead of it before it
becomes generally useful. Perhaps a stylesheet with a targetted
subset of FO would help matters.
-John
Reply to: