Congratulation for po-debiandoc package ITP
It looks like we need to keep PO file in CVS. Am I right?
Below is the typo fix for my previous post for people wondering why I
posed this as a sub-thread.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 01:28:44PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 10:20:23PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:03:45AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > IMO we should distinguish between each format (text, HTML,...) and find
> > the best approach for each one.
> Good point. HTML should be apache friendly and TEXT needs to be file
> browser (mc, gmc, ...) friendly.
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA
See "User's Guide": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/users-guide/
See "Debian reference": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/
"Debian reference" Project at: http://qref.sf.net
I welcome your constructive criticisms and corrections.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com