[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



Congratulation for po-debiandoc package ITP

It looks like we need to keep PO file in CVS.  Am I right?


Below is the typo fix for my previous post for people wondering why I
posed this as a sub-thread.

On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 01:28:44PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 10:20:23PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:03:45AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > IMO we should distinguish between each format (text, HTML,...) and find
>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > the best approach for each one.
> Good point. HTML should be apache friendly and TEXT needs to be file
> browser (mc, gmc, ...) friendly.

~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
 Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA
 See "User's Guide":     http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/users-guide/
 See "Debian reference": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/
 "Debian reference" Project at: http://qref.sf.net

 I welcome your constructive criticisms and corrections.

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-doc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: