Lout (was debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook)

To: debian-doc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Lout (was debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook)
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <avrangel@flevonet.nl>
Date: 27 Nov 1998 18:54:54 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87hfvl10nl.fsf_-_@flevonet.nl>
In-reply-to: Ian Jackson's message of "Thu, 26 Nov 1998 23:13:59 +0000 (GMT)"
References: <87hfvq1dr6.fsf_-_@mdorman.law.miami.edu> <Pine.GSO.3.95.981123133308.16355L-100000@harper.uchicago.edu> <[🔎] 13917.57527.394454.759973@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Regarding the Lout backend: I'm thinking about playing with it to see
whether we can use more of the built-in functionality of Lout, similar
to what we're doing in LaTeX backend.  For example using one of the
available document formats.  Especially when we're implementing more
advanced features such as indexing, tables, figures, etc. it might be
worthwhile.

Ian:  Since you wrote the Lout backend, maybe you can shed a light on this?

Thanks,

Ardo
-- 
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: avrangel@flevonet.nl, ardo@debian.org
home page:  http://www.tip.nl/users/ardo.van.rangelrooij
PGP fp:     3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73  7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9

Reply to:

References:
- Re: debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook
  - From: Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook
Next by Date: Re: debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook
Previous by thread: Re: debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook
Next by thread: Re: debiandoc-sgml vs. docbook
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread