Re: Inconsistencies in DDP home page
Adam Di Carlo <apharris@burrito.onshore.com> writes:
[snip]
> > Changing subject: is there any plan to move from the Debiandoc-SGML
> > markup to DocBook? My understanding is that SGML-tools team did
> > already the move for version 2.0.
>
> If they jumped off a cliff would you?
>
> Did I already respond to this?
Yes, you did, but that doesn't matter. ;-)
> I personally fear that our curve for new documenters is already high
> enough (make, cvs, SGML in any form), and that using a complex DTD
> like docbook is going to make things worse.
>
> Mind you, I love docbook; I use it all the time for work. But I'm not
> really bugged that much by Debiandoc-SGML. Since it is specific to
> debian, I feel it's a more focused DTD which works really well for us
> (kudos to Ardo).
Thank you!!!
I agree. Once we've a good amount of documentation written and there
actually is a need for something bigger we can always move over.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: avrangel@flevonet.nl, ardo@debian.org
home page: http://www.tip.nl/users/ardo.van.rangelrooij
PGP fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
Reply to: