[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should request of binary package removals include ports ?



Charles Plessy, le mar. 16 déc. 2025 11:12:12 +0900, a ecrit:
> > On 12/15/25 3:05 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > At the moment I would ask for removal on armhf, i386 and s390x.  But should I
> > > also list the non-released ports that match my criteria for removal?
> 
> Le Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 02:35:41AM +0100, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > 
> > That's probably preferrable, yes.
> > (at least for hurd-i386)
> 
> Le Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 07:52:56AM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
> > 
> > Architecture details can be found on the wiki:
> > 
> >  https://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo
> 
> Thanks Samuel and Bas for the information!
> 
> Regarding the ports, I see that reportbug CCs the porter lists.  Is that
> something you rely on, or would you prefer not being CCed to avoid getting
> hundreds of emails?

For hurd-i386, I think I do not need to receive the mails, thanks :)

Samuel


Reply to: