Re: Should request of binary package removals include ports ?
> On 12/15/25 3:05 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > At the moment I would ask for removal on armhf, i386 and s390x. But should I
> > also list the non-released ports that match my criteria for removal?
Le Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 02:35:41AM +0100, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>
> That's probably preferrable, yes.
> (at least for hurd-i386)
Le Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 07:52:56AM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit :
>
> Architecture details can be found on the wiki:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/ArchitectureSpecificsMemo
Thanks Samuel and Bas for the information!
Regarding the ports, I see that reportbug CCs the porter lists. Is that
something you rely on, or would you prefer not being CCed to avoid getting
hundreds of emails? And apart from reportbug's source code, is there a place
where one can find the BTS User/usertags pairs for each port?
Have a nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
Debian Med packaging team http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tooting from home https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy
- You do not have my permission to use this email to train an AI -
Reply to: