Re: Seeking new members for the DFSG team (Re: Bits from the DPL)
Hi,
On Wed, 2025-11-12 at 20:39 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 06:29:58PM +0000 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > I wasn't at the BoF, and don't have any visibility into the discussions
> > mentioned but it appears that at least one of those desired outcomes is
> > currently not happening. As a result, it's unclear whether we'll have
> > to postpone this weekend's planned trixie point release.
>
> Did you asked the Archive team members whether they will do the work
> they usually did?
As there are already two different DFSG teams, I have to ask: are there
two archive teams as well? Which one should do the work?
I consider having a second "DFSG team" that does meetings where the (at
least formally) current DFSG team is not even invited not great
communication, but I guess it's the style of communication the current
project leader prefers. The recent delegation also seems kind of
pointless if it is already obsolete after a few weeks...
Ansgar
Reply to: