Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)

To: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
From: "Jonathan Dowland" <jmtd@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 14:30:13 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] DA2Q58Q00610.1XMLQBPZXPE2K@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 7e26c876-ed5d-4e16-867a-37011e5b48f6@riseup.net>
References: <[🔎] 7e26c876-ed5d-4e16-867a-37011e5b48f6@riseup.net>

The formatting of this was mangled so I couldn't figure out which partsof the mail were quotes and which weren't.




--
Please do not CC me for listmail.

👱🏻	Jonathan Dowland
✎	 jmtd@debian.org
🔗	https://jmtd.net

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
  - From: Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org>

References:
- Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
  - From: Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
Next by Date: Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
Previous by thread: Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
Next by thread: Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread