Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)

To: Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 14:36:23 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] aC8aRyIzS8e7LpFq@bongo.bofh.it>
Mail-followup-to: Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 7e26c876-ed5d-4e16-867a-37011e5b48f6@riseup.net>
References: <[🔎] 7e26c876-ed5d-4e16-867a-37011e5b48f6@riseup.net>

On May 22, Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net> wrote:

I think at the very least it's worth exploring its use parallel tosalsa, so we aren't negatively surprised one day.

Good idea: I propose that once a year you report to debian-project@a comparison of the features available in Gitlab and forgejo.


--
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
  - From: Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net>

References:
- Exploring forgejo as alternative to salsa ? (Was Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?)
  - From: Matthias Geiger <werdahias@riseup.net>