Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference

[gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org>]

On Fri, 16 May 2025 16:07:47 +0200, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:

> Le 2025-05-12 15:04, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > Regarding "I don't want a gbp.conf", I think that we should aim for 
> > DRY,
> > and that adding a gbp.conf in every package doesn't sound too great for
> > teams that maintain hundreds or thousands of packages...
> Could having a way to manage "team defaults" for gbp provide some 
> relief here? These could maybe be distributed with the gbp package, or 
> a separate distribution-wide package, or by separate packages managed 
> by each team. The idea would be to add some logic to gbp to apply 
> different defaults depending on the declared maintainer of the 
> package. Such defaults could still be overriden by gbp.conf the same 
> way as current gbp built-in defaults can be.

This idea sounds appealing to me, thank you!


Cheers,
gregor

--
 .''`.  https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
 : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D  85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
 `. `'  Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature