Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?)
On 09/05/25 at 10:27 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > However, I have doubts about (4), since there's still so many different
> > workflows to use Git+Salsa.
>
> Which brings us back to DEP-14 as a baseline recommendation that can
> help reduce friction. While individual workflows vary, having some
> repository is a precondition for any collaboration--and DEP-14 provides a
> neutral, widely accepted starting point.
Err, the current state of things is that DEP-14 is still in CANDIDATE
state, and I read the last thread on this topic as unconclusive[0].
[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/01/msg00080.html
So I wouldn't say that is "widely accepted".
I would love to see data about the actual acceptance of DEP-14 among
packages in the archive: my feeling is that it is currently being a bit
ignored by maintainers and teams (but maybe I'm wrong).
Lucas
Reply to: