On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 11:58:45AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 12/5/25 a las 9:49, Holger Levsen escribió:I dont want to use git-buildpackage and I don't want a gpb.conf. Please accept this. Thanks.I also don't like the idea of adding a gpb.conf to each and every package.
Yes, in most cases when it's needed it's because your branch names and/or pristine-tar usage flag don't match the gbp defaults.
Most of my packages don't have such file and Salsa CI is able to build them.
Because they use the gbp defaults?
Maybe we could assume that if there is no gbp.conf, you can always build the package by creating a source package from the git repo first, as Salsa CI does?
Doesn't Salsa CI use gbp for that? -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature