Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference (Was: ITN procedure?)
On Mon, 12 May 2025 09:54:38 +0200, Gioele Barabucci
<gioele@svario.it> wrote:
>On 12/05/25 09:49, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 03:58:12PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>>> Regardless of what branch names packages use today or in the future,
>>> they should all have a debian/gbp.conf file that defines what branches
>>> and packaging practices are being used *right now*.
>>
>> I dont want to use git-buildpackage and I don't want a gpb.conf. Please accept
>> this. Thanks.
>
>gbp.conf would probably be more widely accepted if it were called
>"Debian.source.conf" or something neutral like that.
Debian/source/branches
Grüße
Marc
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Rhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " |
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Reply to: