El 7/5/25 a las 23:33, Simon Josefsson escribió:
You could probably say that the "must" only applies to "normal systems", but by using both "should" and "normal" in your characterization of "consensus", you are already deviating two steps from what Policy says. If you think Policy does not really represent the consensus, you should probably propose an amendment.But does Policy say anything about the PATH variable content when building packages?
Certainly not. Usually, using sbuild is considered the standard to build packages, and many people would not accept a FTBFS bug being serious if it does not happen when using sbuild. This would probably disqualify a non-standard PATH as a reason to report those bugs as serious. Thanks.