Re: ITN procedure?
Quoting Holger Levsen (2025-05-07 18:59:27)
> On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 05:42:39PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Since you asked: I respectfully find ITN a very bad idea.
>
> +1
>
> > ITS is a process where you intend to take over responsibility.
> >
> > ITN is a process where you intend to put pressure on the existing
> > maintainer for changing their way of doing *their* maintenance.
> >
> > If I am mistaken and ITN is only mild one-off contributions same a NMUs
> > then I fail to see a reason for simply doing a 21-day-delayed NMU.
>
> an 21-delayed NMU would also be inappropriate because we don't change the
> vcs in an NMU, however delayed.
*mild one-off contributions* obviously do not involve changes to vcs!
My point is: Either do a 21-day NMU (by established rules of NMUs, not
expanding them) or admit that your aim is to impose peer pressure - i.e.
don't disguise it as related to an NMU but call it something more
telling like NMD - Non-Maintainer Demand.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
* Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Reply to: