Re: ITN procedure?
Quoting Andreas Tille (2025-05-07 17:16:07)
> I fully agree that any deviation from our established NMU practices
> should be discussed and, ideally, based on shared understanding. I plan
> to bring a concrete proposal to the relevant lists in the near future.
> In the meantime, feedback and concerns are very welcome--particularly
> from those with experience in NMUs, low-maintenance packages, and
> collaborative workflows.
Since you asked: I respectfully find ITN a very bad idea.
ITS is a process where you intend to take over responsibility.
ITN is a process where you intend to put pressure on the existing
maintainer for changing their way of doing *their* maintenance.
If I am mistaken and ITN is only mild one-off contributions same a NMUs
then I fail to see a reason for simply doing a 21-day-delayed NMU.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
* Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Reply to: