Re: finally end single-person maintainership
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: finally end single-person maintainership
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 00:54:07 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 3a37fbe405996d85f6b516c5695be7912be196d8.camel@bzed.de>
- In-reply-to: <171278381686.1830534.2688814922923947381@localhost>
- References: <Zg-8svNyDfmDJYen@an3as.eu> <87h6gfrfet.fsf@daath.pimeys.fr> <ZhBuS5J3f/kgBbcG@seventeen> <87wmpaoxny.fsf@daath.pimeys.fr> <ZhKgPwWiO7nOnArv@pc220518.home.grep.be> <ZhKn4gQpexhsmW0R@an3as.eu> <20240407204234.GJ4300@mail.wookware.org> <9240c6f3-117a-4b69-ac54-0f80335cfad7@debian.org> <20240409165211.GW4300@mail.wookware.org> <Zhb6KRer7Y_bjYfK@an3as.eu> <171278381686.1830534.2688814922923947381@localhost>
On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 23:16 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Quoting Andreas Tille (2024-04-10 22:44:25)
> > > I do understand the argument that lots of different workflows
> > > adds
> > > friction. But I'm just still using what used to be _the_ standard
> > > one
> > > (insofar as we ever had such a thing). Putting everything in
> > > salsa/git
> > > doesn't standardise workflows in itself. I think Ian/Sean
> > > identified 12
> > > different git-based methods in their dgit review.
> >
> > I agree that different workflows are not helpful. We have DEP14[1]
> > ... but we have no efficient processes to
> > a) accept DEPs
> > b) dedicate to accepted DEPs
>
> or teach gbp about DEP14. See this git-buildpackage bug from *six*
> years ago:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829444
DEP14 is a candidate, I can't see that there was any consensus to
accept it. Just because there is a DEP there is no need to implement it
without having any consensus on it.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
Reply to: