Re: pandoc-filter-diagram_0.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org>]

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:35 PM Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> wrote:
>
> Hi FTP-masters (cc d-devel list),
>
> A package, that I had initially introduced to Debian some months ago and
> had been pending in NEW queue since, was rejected few days ago, like
> this:
>
> Quoting Debian FTP Masters (2024-05-14 12:00:12)
> >
> > An exception was raised while processing the package:
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 121, in wrapper
> >     function(upload, srcqueue, comments, transaction)
> >   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 248, in comment_accept
> >     transaction.copy_binary(
> >   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 390, in copy_binary
> >     self._ensure_extra_source_exists(filename, db_source, archive, extra_archives=extra_archives)
> >   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 214, in _ensure_extra_source_exists
> >     raise ArchiveException('{0}: Built-Using refers to package {1} (= {2}) not in target archive {3}.'.format(filename, source.source, source.version, archive.archive_name))
> > daklib.archive.ArchiveException: p/pandoc-filter-diagram/pandoc-filter-diagram_0.2.1-1_amd64.deb: Built-Using refers to package rust-ahash (= 0.8.9-2) not in target archive ftp-master.
>
> I it correct to derive from the above, that packages in NEW queue must
> be freshly built, and that I (and we, generally) therefore should
> routinely rebuild packages pending in NEW queue to ensure that they are
> acceptably?

Not a ftp-master, but if you see such a message, it means that your
package has already been accepted, and you can continue uploading
without going through the NEW queue again.

-- 
Shengjing Zhu