[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Do not plan to support /usr/lib/pam.d for Debian pam

On Sat, 16 Sept 2023 at 11:20, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 02:08:06PM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >
> >
> > Apropos of the discussion about removing default configuration from
> > /etc.
> > Upstream PAM now supports doing that.  You can set up a vendor directory
> > such as /usr/lib where pam.d and security live.
> What are other distributions doing here?

I have been told by an upstream PAM maintainer, and by
Fedora/Suse/Arch folks at the image-based linux summit this week that
this is not an issue in their respective distros, and that the way
they ship the default PAM configuration works using only /usr.

Reply to: