On 03/12, Tobias Frost wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 06:35:39PM -0700, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While working on a new version of the kworkflow package > > (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/kworkflow), we noticed that the current > > version is 20191112-1.2, and the latest upstream version is 0.6.2. > > Version 20191112-1.2 was created because the upstream had no official > > release at that time; for this reason, the 20191112-1.2 was created and > > named based on a date. > > > > This package did not get any update in a long time, and now the upstream > > release frequent versions. The latest version is 0.6.2 > > (https://github.com/kworkflow/kworkflow/tags), and I'm trying to release > > a new version of this package > > (https://salsa.debian.org/siqueira/kworkflow/-/tree/master/debian). So, > > to do a clean update, we should add 1:0.6.2-1 as an epoch to fix the > > problem generated by the first version of this package. > > > > Is that ok? > > I've got recently a very similiar situtation with > gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar, as there it was considered ok to use an > epoch. [1] Thanks all for the help with this topic. > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00424.html > > -- > tobi > > > > Thanks > > -- > > Rodrigo Siqueira > > https://siqueira.tech > > -- Rodrigo Siqueira https://siqueira.tech
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature