Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch

To: "debian-devel@lists.debian.org" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch
From: Thomas DiModica <ricinwich@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 01:09:38 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] 48006131.1130961.1659920978364@mail.yahoo.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87iln5tcb1.fsf@hands.com>
References: <90018319.2085513.1658282328838.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <90018319.2085513.1658282328838@mail.yahoo.com> <2097876150.2340452.1659166163157@mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 736283087.877338.1659762733225@mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 87o7wxu7hw.fsf@hands.com> <[🔎] 500108038.954442.1659808988322@mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 87iln5tcb1.fsf@hands.com>

 On Saturday, August 6, 2022 at 01:14:05 PM MDT, Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> wrote: 
> I was really saying that whoever feels competent to decide to accept the
> Merge Request for the bc package ought to come up with a better
> description for why they think the patch should be applied to the Debian
> package, but I'm sure your description will help too.

I'm sure that it ought to be applied upstream, however, I've had trouble
contacting upstream. Maybe this will help with that.

Thanks again,
Thomas DiModica

Reply to:

References:
- Unsolicited GNU bc patch
  - From: Thomas DiModica <ricinwich@yahoo.com>
- Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch
  - From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
- Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch
  - From: Thomas DiModica <ricinwich@yahoo.com>
- Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch
  - From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#1016130: ITP: asdf -- multiple language runtime version manager
Next by Date: Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch
Previous by thread: Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch
Next by thread: Re: Unsolicited GNU bc patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread