Paul Wise left as an exercise for the reader: > I think the same problem and suggestions also apply with the current > system of prods and rejects, so please do add or propose adding it in > the appropriate documentation and templates. I will of course seek to > preserve these statements if I end up working on the BTS proposal. absolutely, there's just enough opacity in a current REJECT (in my fairly minimal experience) that i think it less susceptible to such invalid inferences. but yes, this is something that could go in the Mentors notes now. (to be sure, at no time did i intend to impugn your suggestions in this thread, which seem a definite improvement from the user's perspective.) -- nick black -=- https://www.nick-black.com to make an apple pie from scratch, you need first invent a universe.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature