Hello everyone, Thank you for your input and guidance. I've only been in Debian for a year so I still have many things to learn. I assumed there would be issues with library name conflicts and wanted to get the group's opinion. >> Or if the goal is rather to experiment and expose BabaSSL to the many archs >> we have in Debian, then keep it in unstable only by filing a bug to block >> it from testing. > Or better: experimental, to avoid packages starting to (build-)depend on it. It sounds like it would be suitable for the community if I continue the packaging work but restrict the package to experimental? I'd like to continue working on it but also want to avoid any conflicts with Debian policy, security, etc. Any objections? Thank you, Lance Lin <lqi254@protonmail.com> GPG Fingerprint: 8CAD 1250 8EE0 3A41 7223 03EC 7096 F91E D75D 028F
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature