[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unique kernel with my own backup of all Debian repositories



There's a thing in the world called reasonable use.
If you scrape a whole bunch of repository in a short time, this will put
a heavy load on server not meant to be used this way.

This is why your address is being blocked and will continue to do so.
As already written by other people too, there's no such authority that
could change this for you. So you'll have to find a way to lower the
resources used for your actions.

One way to do so is put a delay in between the requests, like already
suggested.

I'd give you a hint of using the debmirror software (or aptly /
apt-mirror) as this is meant to create a local copy of the Debian
packages repository, you can add options for getting source code too.

Maybe you shall learn how to copy a public key using scp and entering a
password. (because you keep the private one on your own computer, but
you seem to do it the other way around).

Don't confuse between Ubuntu itself and the interface offered by Digital
Ocean, two different thing. They only offer a control panel, accessible
from the web without any link to Ubuntu (or Debian or whatever).

If you don't believe what I say, then install a Ubuntu box on your local
network and copy a key directly to it. And be assured, it will work
using scp. First time you'll need to enter the password and after the
key is added to authorized_keys then it will be okay.

Not please, save us from those delusion style affirmation such as


> server on Digital Ocean, for example, using Ubuntu 18.04. Unless they
> are just picking on me in particular, you will find some changes in

You are far from being so much of importance, please get back to earth
if you want some help.

And use the proper words for what you mean.

If I say, I want to write a new kernel based on Debian then it means I
want to replace the "Linux kernel". There's no other kernel, unless you
talk about the FreeBSD based version of Debian or the Mach version of
Debian, both who use a different Kernel than the Linux one.

The basis for communication is a common language or the desire to use a
recognized and standard protocol for communication. If I use word
because they seem great but are out of their meaning, then it's
pointless to communicate.

Hope you get this one now.

On 2021-06-12 3:52 p.m., John E Petersen wrote:
> Dear *Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside, *I would appreciate it if you would
> stay out of conversations which you do not understand. Your rude
> response was not well-received. Are you suggesting there are no
> government employees in the open source community? Such an assertion is
> naive at best.
> 
> The green light I'm requesting is to keep my ip addresses from being
> blocked as I scrape the Debian repositories. Please work on your reading
> comprehension skills. I am requesting permission from the community as a
> whole, which is why I am using a mailing list which addresses the
> developers of said community.
> 
> Existing servers should be fine. However, I invite you to create a new
> server on Digital Ocean, for example, using Ubuntu 18.04. Unless they
> are just picking on me in particular, you will find some changes in
> protocol, such as the inability to upload a private key within a bash
> shell without first making configurations in a web browser. This is a
> new security hole, in case you were not aware.
> 
> Again, work on your reading comprehension skills. I said I am developing
> a unique kernel, based on Debian Linux... I said nothing about writing
> an entire Linux kernel from scratch... Furthermore, I never said
> anything about copying code... Plus, I said credit would be given where
> it was due, if I even ever decided to distribute it.
> 
> It is really a simple task to modify and personalize a kernel. Perhaps
> you should try before you criticize someone you have never met before.
> Additionally, you have zero knowledge of my relationship with any
> government, so do not assume you know anything about me, besides what I
> just told you, which you clearly are not a skilled enough reader to
> comprehend.
> 
> Finally, there was only one question mark in the entire email. Let me
> paraphrase, because your reading comprehension skills are lacking: *why
> is my ip address getting blocked repeatedly as I scrape open source, and
> may I have permission to scrape appropriately without being blocked?*
> I'm asking permission from the community as a whole, which is why I am
> asking the developer mailing list as a whole. If you do not know the
> answer to my question, what was the purpose of your ridiculous retorts?
> 
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 9:52 AM Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> <debian@polynamaude.com <mailto:debian@polynamaude.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     On 2021-06-12 12:21 p.m., John E Petersen wrote:
>     > Hey folks, I’m developing a unique kernel based on Debian Linux, and
>     > I’ve been scraping the website for repositories. After a few thousand,
>     > the servers start to block my ip. 
>     >
>     > I’m just trying to keep the crazy government out of Linux, because
>     they
>     > keep monkeying with repositories on Ubuntu, not to mention
>     > snap/snapd/brltty/systemd…
> 
>     Did you smoke something that wasn't meant to end up in your lungs ? Have
>     you ingested some mushrooms ?
> 
>     What you write here is a total screw-up non-sense !
> 
>     1st : There's no "government" in Linux. It's a community driven project,
>     like Debian.
> 
>     2nd : You talk about Ubuntu repository, sorry, beep, bong, whatever,
>     wake-up call, this is Debian, no Ubuntu repository here.
> 
>     3rd : What's the link between Snap/SnapD/Brltyy and SystemD ?
> 
>     Plus, they’ve totally screwed up Digital
>     > Ocean and more or less OVH, so I need a unique kernel (and physical
>     > servers) to host my wholesome websites. Not to rant, but it has really
>     > gotten ridiculous.
> 
>     And now, you put on some specific entities to have screwed Digital Ocean
>     and OVH (two different company). Sorry dude ! I'm running many OVH rack
>     and none of them have any problem running Debian Buster or Bullseye,
>     straight out of the box.
> 
> 
>     >
>     > I’m not doing anything malicious, and the repositories seem to have
>     > extremely flexible licensing, so what’s the problem? If I ever wind up
>     > distributing such a kernel which allows access to my copies of the
>     > repositories, I would give credit where it’s due, of course. 
>     >
> 
>     So you woke up and decided on your own, you're gonna write a brand new
>     kernel, fully compatible with the Linux kernel ? All by yourself ?
> 
>     Watch what you are doing, because it would be a bad thing to copy the
>     code of others while doing so !
> 
>     > If you guys would give me the green light, I’d appreciate it. I’m not
>     > saying I would ever distribute such a thing, but I’m not ruling
>     out the
>     > possibility either. I’m not looking to mirror, just to be clear.
>     >
> 
>     What "green light" are you expecting here ? Everyone talk for their own
>     self. I think you are missing a really important part here...
> 
>     There's no "central" entity that will give you a "go a head" on the name
>     of others. It's not like working for IBM where you employer hold the
>     copyright of your works.
>     > Salud de Mexico,
>     > John (Tarbal) 
> 
>     -- 
>     Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
>     -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
> 

-- 
Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside
-Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: