On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 07:31:09PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > Obviously I cannot promise anything here; I'm currently even more in the dark
> > than you. :-) But if there's a list of relevant bugs somewhere, I at least
> > have a place to try to understand the issues at hand.
The one bug I had in mind when I wrote my email was this:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1250231
However I saw in the past also some cases of a bug reported, few
versions later bug fixed, but actually the bug wasn't even touched, so
most likely somebody else noticed "internally" but never saw the bug
report.
Besides that, look at the stupidly long list of patches. I consider it
fair to say that for most of them chromium upstream could just trivially
incorporate build flags or support our needs: none of those patches
change foundamental behaviour or so.
> PS: I have included Mattia Rizzolo, Michael Gilbert and the Debian Chromium
> Team directly in the recipients, to be sure they see this email. I do hope
> you all do not mind.
That's all fine with me (also, I'm subscribed to d-d@ (and d-release@),
but I'm not actually involved in the maintenance.
Rather, I'm adding here Michel Le Bihan who actually maintained chromium
in the past 8+ months, and I can only say that he did a great job,
despite the short time.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature