Le jeudi 12 août 2021, 09:52:53 UTC Bastien Roucariès a écrit : > Le mercredi 11 août 2021, 14:00:37 UTC Steve McIntyre a écrit : > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 03:19:10PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > >Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > >> I am going to compile shell.efi from source. > > >> > > >> I whish to install to something stable, but I need an arch triplet in > > >> order to put in a multiarch (like) location. > > >> > > >> I suppose that it will be x86_64-efi-none (or maybe x86_64-windows-efi > > >> ) and i686-uefi-none ? > > > > As Simon says, *definitely* not *windows* here please! :-) > > > > >I don't think GRUB's x86_64-efi is an architecture triplet, just a > > >GRUB-specific target. > > > > > >UEFI is effectively an "operating system", insofar as it provides a > > >runtime environment with some baseline properties and a set of system > > >calls. uefi definitely isn't a "vendor", and the OS shouldn't be "none" > > >since there is an OS of sorts. > > > > > >For that reason, Rust uses the target names "aarch64-unknown-uefi", > > >"i686-unknown-uefi", and "x86_64-unknown-uefi". Those seem like the > > >right names for these targets in other toolchains, as well. > > > > Nod, agreed. I think that makes sense. > > Ok thanks > > For the triplet this will be : > - i686-unknown-uefi > - x86_64-unknown-uefi > Where should I push this triplet ? > > Ant therefore we get the multiarch tupple: > - i386-uefi > - amd64-uefi > If I am right ? > I have added to https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Tuples but I suppuse I > should open a bug somewhere (dpkg ?) I have changed the arch name, it will be: uefi-i686 uefi-amd64 with multiarch tupple i686-uefi, x86_64-uefi I think it is better in line with current kfreebsd pratice... Bastien > > Bastien > > Bastien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.