Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> writes: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 02:20:28PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> > the packages being untouched for a long time in some cases meaning there is >> > no guarantee for quality. >> >> Sure, but if there is no serious issue left with the package, we can as >> well ship it. > Strictly speaking, there is a big logical error here. > If a package doesn't have RC bugs that doesn't mean it's fit for a > stable release, doesn't have serious issues, or even is usable. Wouldn't it be quite the massive paradigm shift to give up on the notion of tracking problems (= bugs), and instead try to track positive attributes like fitness for release, though? -- Gard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature