On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 02:20:28PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > the packages being untouched for a long time in some cases meaning there is > > no guarantee for quality. > > Sure, but if there is no serious issue left with the package, we can as > well ship it. Strictly speaking, there is a big logical error here. If a package doesn't have RC bugs that doesn't mean it's fit for a stable release, doesn't have serious issues, or even is usable. And if a package has an RC bug that doesn't mean it's not usable etc., it just means it has some problem that fits the definition of an RC bug (or, even, that doesn't, but nobody lowered the severity). But the project decided to use these criteria in the absence of better ones, just as the project decided to use obviously flawed popcon stats. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature