Re: RFC: Standardizing source package artifacts build paths
I'm concerned about a leading . at least for:
* the debian/tmp replacement
* the replacement for the package install directories under debian.
I think that maintaining those directories such that ls shows them will
be more friendly for new maintainers.
So I'd prefer something like debian/build rather than debian/.build for
at least those directories.
I don't care as much about substvars, debhelper intermediates, debhelper
logs and the like.
Reply to: