Re: Package dependency versions and consistency
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 03:51:12PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>...
> 3) Such a patch would require further analysis to determine if other
> changes need to happen in concert to avoid breakage. If abc exposes
> any types from xyz, it may need a major version bump as well; this
> isn't common, but anyone writing such a patch would need to check.
> Furthermore, much more commonly, moving to xyz 3.0.1 requires
> checking if some other dependency uses a different version of xyz and
> expects to interoperate (e.g. passing an xyz::Foo to
> xyz_helper::takes_a_foo won't work if you upgrade your xyz but not
> xyz_helper's xyz, which would typically involve upgrading xyz_helper
> as well).
>...
Note that this is a problem that is created by your proposal.
The simple solution is never having more than one version of xyz
in unstable.
> - Josh Triplett
cu
Adrian
Reply to: