Hi,
On Thu., Oct. 8, 2020, 00:30 Nicholas Guriev, <
guriev-ns@ya.ru> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 19:17 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 7:15 PM Jeremy Bicha <
jeremy@bicha.net> wrote:
> > > You should be aware that Ubuntu implemented this idea 2 years ago.
> >
> > Oh, I misread. Ubuntu used /usr/bin/browse but 'open' sounds a lot better.
>
> In my view, both of these words, "browse" or "open" do not look like a command
> for computer. Their drawback is that they are too general.
Well, we already have a /usr/bin/see symlink to run-mailcap, despite this critique...not many people seem to know about it though. I agree that "browse" has bad semantics, is confusing, and I'd additionally reject it as idiosyncratic.
The proposed "open" symlink supports the specific case of users coming from MacOS, because we already have "see" as a solution to the problem. I'd like to see "see" documented in more places, and I don't see any obvious reasons why an additional symlink that provides familiarity for MacOS users is a bad thing, with one exception: is /usr/bin/open too much of a namespace grab? Should it be reserved for something more generic and low-level?
Best,
Nicholas