Mass bugs filing: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

[Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>]

Hi All,

If the test done in the autopkgtest does not provide significant test
coverage then it should be marked with "Restrictions: superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-tests.html

Examples of tests which are not significant includes (its not a complete list):

1) Executing the binary to check version
    Test-Command: foo -v
    Test-Command: foo -V
    Test-Command: foo --version

2) Executing the binary to check help (foo -h)
    Test-Command: foo -h
    Test-Command: foo --help

3) checking for files installed with 'ls'.
    Test-Command: ls -l /usr/lib/*/foo.so

4) A Python or Perl library runs import foo or require Foo; but does
not attempt to use the library beyond that.
     Test-Command: python3 -c "import foo"

I am still trying to figure out a generalized method to find them but
an initial script has found 83 packages. Attached is the dd-list.
I intend to open the bug reports on them next week.

--
Regards
Sudip

Attachment: dd-list
Description: Binary data