Re: Backports needed for Firefox/Thunderbird ESR 78 in Buster/Stretch
- To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
- Cc: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-lts@lists.debian.org, Debian Security Team <team@security.debian.org>, pkg-rust-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net, Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de>, LLVM Packaging Team <pkg-llvm-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Backports needed for Firefox/Thunderbird ESR 78 in Buster/Stretch
- From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 05:25:28 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20200901202528.jhao2lgu6vf62avk@glandium.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Christoph Martin <martin@uni-mainz.de>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-lts@lists.debian.org, Debian Security Team <team@security.debian.org>, pkg-rust-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net, Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de>, LLVM Packaging Team <pkg-llvm-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20200901171729.gshplleir6ox7fwx@inutil.org>
- References: <20190702204520.GB12040@pisco.westfalen.local> <20190819210113.GA3155@pisco.westfalen.local> <20190821054552.GB8735@lorien.valinor.li> <a4e15a54-85c8-4f19-74cf-9c323c974496@debian.org> <20200802162130.GA3985@pisco.westfalen.local> <20200831182650.GA52290@pisco.westfalen.local> <[🔎] c3819856-8c22-f95b-fb2c-5ff7a65cb893@uni-mainz.de> <[🔎] 366993f5-1038-b480-1ec8-9663331e5298@debian.org> <[🔎] 20200901171729.gshplleir6ox7fwx@inutil.org>
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:17:29PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:35:42PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 01/09/2020 14:05, Christoph Martin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am not shure if I can help, but I can try and have a look at it.
> > >
> > > Yes please upload your LLVM9 and wasi-libc backports.
> >
> > fwiw I started to look at this and have an LLVM 10 backport ready. Should we go
> > with that instead?
>
> I'm fine either way.
>
> > It may be more future-proof, in case we need it for a future
> > rustc for the next ESR bump.
>
> My gut feeling is the next ESR thing will need LLVM 11 or so, but happy to
> be proven wrong :-) So maybe let's directly move to 10 directly.
>
> Once uploaded and acked threw NEW, I'll upload wasi-lib rebuilt against
> LLVM, then.
Note Firefox doesn't need wasi-libc at the moment. Neither does
thunderbird AFAICT.
Mike
Reply to: