[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#958710: ITP: nss-tls -- encrypted glibc name resolving library which uses DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH)

>>> The only reason right now is because it's the name used by upstream. I
>>> choose to keep the current name and mention DoH in the description to
>>> help search.
>>> I plan to ask upstream author if they intend to support DoT in the
>>> future then the name makes a little more sense. Otherwise if they can
>>> change the name to nss-https or something else to avoid confusion.
>> Would it make sense to resolve that with upstream before introducing this to 
>> Debian?  It would save a trip through New and the confusion inherent in 
>> package name instability.


I opened an issue upstream on
https://github.com/dimkr/nss-tls/issues/55. I hope I am not too enthusiast!


Reply to: