Hello, On Sat 11 Apr 2020 at 11:56AM -04, Scott Kitterman wrote: > It's nonsense. There is zero difference in what's accepted or not based on if > the machine readable copyright format is used. We may point out errors in use > of the machine readable format, but it's not a criteria for rejection since > its use is optional (note: there may have been occasional instances of this > when combined with other problems). Yes, except when the misuse of the machine-readable format makes the copyright file say the wrong thing, or makes it too ambiguous. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature