[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: What to do when DD considers policy to be optional? [kubernetes]

On Wednesday, 25 March 2020 2:34:03 PM AEDT Michael Lustfield wrote:
> With regard to the kubernetes package, I don't see anything to indicate it
> was abandoned.

Sorry if I did not make it clear: the package was orphaned as per #886739.
The takeover was only technological. I don't dispute the ownership of the 

> One person is
> interested in maintaining the package per our standards, and another is
> interested in getting it updated.

It is all about balance... I think we can have both: a package updated with 
respect to our standards or at least with best effort to respect standards. 

I'm not interested in maintaining Kubernetes any more. I simply can't afford 
to spend more time on it after investing so much already. I'm somewhat 
disappointed in upstream and their handling of the project. I'm not even 
using Kubernetes and my concerns are about packaging practices and 

All the best,
 Dmitry Smirnov.


Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's
mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.
        -- George Orwell, 1984.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: