[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: Replacing vim-tiny with nano in essential packages

On Mar 16, Tomas Pospisek <tpo2@sourcepole.ch> wrote:

> > Agreed: this is a very good idea since I really think that every default 
> > install must provide something enough vi-compatible.
> I'd disagree. vi is very newbie unfriendly. OTOH I expect people that
Even if this were true (using vi is one of the most basic system 
administration skills), I understand that we still provide nano.

> know how to navigate vi to be able to `apt install vi` without any problem.
As long as there is network connectivity, and it is working.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: