On Mar 16, Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> wrote: > `busybox vi` is rather limited, but is reasonable as an editor of last > resort; busybox is smaller than either nano or vim-tiny; full systems Agreed: this is a very good idea since I really think that every default install must provide something enough vi-compatible. A simple solution could be to have busybox provide vi as a very low priority alternative. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature