On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:52:32PM +0100, Jędrzej Dudkiewicz wrote: > > > I have custom package (zs-boost_1.71.0_armhf.deb) that install libraries > > > to /opt/deps (which is not a big problem since we install on BeagleBone > > > with custom image on SD-card, also because of few exotic requirements it > > > is a necessity). I'm trying to build yet another package using libraries > > > from aforementioned package. > > I don't think you described whether the zs-boost package provides enough > > info about the libs it contains (so DEBIAN/shlibs and/or DEBIAN/symbols). > Thanks for an answer. > > After: > > ar xf zs-boost_1.71.0_armhf.deb > tar xf control.tar.gz dpkg-deb -e > I have "shlibs" file with (partial output): > > libboost_atomic 1.71.0 zs-boost > libboost_chrono 1.71.0 zs-boost > libboost_date_time 1.71.0 zs-boost > libboost_filesystem 1.71.0 zs-boost > libboost_iostreams 1.71.0 zs-boost > libboost_prg_exec_monitor 1.71.0 zs-boost > libboost_regex 1.71.0 zs-boost > > So I'd say yes, yes it is. The lines don't have version restrictions so the behavior you see is expected and correct. See also deb-shlibs(5). Debian library packages are also different for different sonames so not having version restrictions works for them in the simplest cases, unlike yours. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature