Hallo Ulrike, 12.02.20 17:46 Ulrike Uhlig: > On 12.02.20 17:01, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote: > > In any case, since DSA had to restart everything at UBC, the piuparts > > slave got restarted as well and it's churning through the backlog. > > Unfortunately it looks like restarting the slave just eats its logs. > > I'd like to attract your attention to this very fine document: > > https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-knodel-terminology-00.html#rfc.section.1.1 > > Quoting from there: "Master-slave is an oppressive metaphor that will > and should never become fully detached from history." > > As an alternative: > "Several options are suggested here and should be chosen based on the > pairing that is most clear in context: > > Primary-secondary > Leader-follower > Active-standby > Primary-replica > Writer-reader > Coordinator-worker > Parent-helper > " I don't think giving slaves new labels helps them in any way; they will still be slaves. Or do you intend to actually liberate them? If yes: how? which liberties are they supposed to gain? If no: then you're actually helping the slave owners hiding their wrongdoings. Grüße Timo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.