Re: Y2038 - best way forward in Debian?
>>>>> "Ansgar" == Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> writes:
Ansgar> On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 08:33 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Steve, you're presuming that we would not create a new soname for
>> libc6 on architectures where we want a new time ABI.
Ansgar> Isn't the libc ABI for some reason part of Debian's
Ansgar> architecture name? uclibc-linux-amd64, musl-linux-i386,
Ansgar> i386 are distict architectures after all. So an
Ansgar> incompatible newglibc-linux-i386 would be different from
Ansgar> i386 as well?
Not if they are coinstallable.
As an example libc5 and libc6 were both on the i386 architecture.
Reply to: