On Feb 04, Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> wrote: > Well, I guess such a new (conditinally selectable) name could be > coordinated with glibc upstream? Say bump 32-bit ports to use libc6.1? > (We already have precedent in some ports that do not use the same > prevalent SONAME, such as libc6.1, libc0.1 and libc0.1.) But it would > indeed involve lots of work, with massive amounts of package renames. :/ This may be a good time to mention that SONAMEs like libc6.1 are not supported by libtool, so in libxcrypt I had to conditionally patch the generated libtool executable for the architectures that did this. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature