On Jan 03, Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> wrote:
> Yes, there's drawbacks in general. However, you *cannot* just say, we're
> going to use the systemd implementation "just because it's the
> refrence", without even giving me some space to at least *TRY* the
As usual this is about much more than you, and I am quite concerned that
you are apparently oblivious to that.
You started by arguing that Debian should adopt/invent a custom API not
used by any other distribution and proposed that the systemd maintainers
work on adopting alternatives for something which the alternatives
system was not designed for.
Since your proposal requires that other people do significant work then
it should not be unexpected that you are being asked to justify its
usefulness.
> implementation. But maybe we should first *try* open{tmpfiles,sysusers}
> to see if it has any value. At the present moment, I just don't know yet
> if it can be a good or a bad replacement.
Maybe *you* should try that and then report back your findings.
--
ciao,
Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature