Re: opentmpfiles & opensysusers, and its use in the Debian policy
>>>>> "Marco" == Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> writes:
>> You are being obviously biased toward systemd here. Just try to think a
Marco> Indeed: obviously, most people actually do not mind using systemd...
>> 2nd time: the same way, what if opentmpfiles implements a new feature
>> that is *not* in systemd implementation? There, we have an exit
Marco> What if a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it?
Marco, I think that the two sentences I quoted from you, especially in
the context of other statements you've made are disrespectful of people
who disagree with you to the extent that they are not appropriate here.
The project just concluded a vote. The winning option was specifically
about facilitating the sort of innovation Thomas asks about above.
You may think it is unlikely.
But there are perfectly good answers to talk about how to promote that
innovation without making things harder for systemd users or being rude.
I'd already given some; others also had already joined in.
The discussion was not advanced by you antagonizing Thomas.
Please stop.
--Sam
Reply to: