Re: list of upstream tarball signing schemes?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: list of upstream tarball signing schemes?
From: thomas@koch.ro
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 15:32:27 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] 1986491859.113655.1577543547779@office.mailbox.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20191213154717.5wi2anpsezmgz3vb@yuggoth.org>
References: <[🔎] 741687795.13865.1576230935028@office.mailbox.org> <[🔎] 20191213135414.GA6708@psi5.com> <[🔎] 20191213154717.5wi2anpsezmgz3vb@yuggoth.org>

Thank you for your input. I opened a bug with upstream:
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/3293

Reply to:

References:
- list of upstream tarball signing schemes?
  - From: Thomas Koch <thomas@koch.ro>
- Re: list of upstream tarball signing schemes?
  - From: Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org>
- Re: list of upstream tarball signing schemes?
  - From: Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Idea: frontend tool for more efficient license reviewing based on tree-structured IR
Next by Date: Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)
Previous by thread: Re: list of upstream tarball signing schemes?
Next by thread: Bug#946670: ITP: tcl9.0 -- Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v9.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread